|
|
Post by jamshundred on Aug 30, 2020 1:51:46 GMT
Many knew it...just could not prove what common sense suggested. Now get rid of the damn useless masks!! This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded actually died from CovidThat's 9,210 deaths The other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses & the overwhelming majority were of very advanced age” facebook.com/1566405890/posts/10224050038749877/?extid=gr0T716wo2v3tjFm&d=n…Image Image 3:30 PM · Aug 29, 2020 17.2K |
|
|
|
Post by cddexter on Aug 30, 2020 14:53:26 GMT
Just looking at CDC website. Don't get the same info you did. Covid related deaths for the past week were 7.9% of all deaths. Were you by chance looking at that?
And, of course, if you have serious other illnesses, and you die a week or a month or a year early because of Covid, I guess if you subtract all those who were going to die anyway, it could well be that low. In fact, if you subtract all the other causes, since we all die sooner of later of something, you could probably make a case that there are no deaths from Covid at all.
Is that where you got the 'rigged' from in your title?
c. |
|
|
|
Post by jamshundred on Sept 2, 2020 19:50:42 GMT
rondo123456 says: September 2, 2020 at 11:52 am The Big COVID Con Exposed “The new CDC statistics show that only 6,640 deaths are due to COVID alone, rather than the commonly reported 164,280 deaths allegedly associated with COVID. In other words, only 4 percent of media sensationalized deaths were due solely to COVID and not other underlying medical conditions… Sensitivity of the PCR tests has to do with amplification of genetic material from the virus. The fewer cycles required, the higher the viral load and greater likelihood of being contagious. By setting the threshold of amplification cycles too high, the test is overly sensitive. Imagine a home security alarm so sensitive that it is triggered by a wind gust or leaf hitting a window. The homeowner will certainly be alerted if an intruder is attempting to break in, but the alarm will be going off constantly with false, or in the case of the virus, non-clinically significant positives. Or as the NY Times put it, www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/09/the_big_covid_con_exposed.html |
|
|
|
Post by cddexter on Sept 5, 2020 1:19:35 GMT
hey brain dead chick:
Coronavirus: The US has not reduced its Covid-19 death toll to 6% of total
By Christopher Giles and Olga Robinson
BBC Reality Check, 4 September 2020
Related TopicsReality Check
President Trump at a rallyImage copyright Getty Images
Image caption
President Trump retweeted the claim
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says it has been deluged with queries about false rumours the official tally of Covid-19 deaths is drastically lower than the publicised headline figure of about 185,000.
Social-media posts making this bogus claim have been circulating widely on the internet.
And one re-tweeted by President Trump was removed by Twitter for breaching its guidelines.
What exactly is the claim?
The claim, being amplified by supporters of QAnon conspiracies and others, is only 6% of the total number of people with coronavirus on their death certificate actually died from the virus.
This is misleading and not true.
A social media post making false claims about the CDC death toll It's correct to state of all the death certificates in the US that mention Covid-19, only 6% mention no other illnesses.
However, 92% of the total clearly state Covid-19 as the underlying cause of death. So while a pat may have had lung problems or diabetes referred to on their certificates, coronavirus has been given as the main cause of death.
The CDC also says the death certificates may include conditions caused by coronavirus, such as respiratory issues.
This information on death certificates has featured for months on CDC's website, with regular updates.
Most people who die from coronavirus are elderly or have had existing health problems.
Having underlying health problems makes pats more vulnerable to becoming seriously ill from coronavirus, just as it makes them more vulnerable to becoming very sick from other viruses.
But this doesn't detract from the fact the virus is their primary cause of death.
It's also the case that early on during the pandemic, when testing was not widespread, people died of Covid-19 without it being noted on their death certificate.
In England and Wales, of deaths involving coronavirus between March and June 2020, there was at least one other condition in just over 90% of cases.
How has the claim spread?
Variations of the claim, promoted by those looking to downplay the extent of the pandemic, have been circulating on Twitter since at least mid-June.
But the allegations went seriously viral only at the end of August, when shared by a number of influential accounts, including President Trump's.
Some Twitter users have since even changed their names to include "6%".
The claim has also been widely shared on Facebook by some conservative news pages, Trump supporters and others seeking an end to coronavirus restrictions.
Some of the most popular posts have gathered more than 10,000 shares.
In the past few days, claims have also featured in adverts circulated on Facebook and Instagram, dismissing the coronavirus pandemic as a "hoax".
This is not the first time CDC data has been used to promote misleading claims about the coronavirus death toll in the US.
In May, posts on social media cited figures based on death certificates to suggest the Covid-19 death toll was significantly inflated.
They pointed out these numbers were much lower than elsewhere, ignoring the CDC disclaimer saying these death counts were delayed and "may differ from other published sources".
|
|
|
|
Post by jamshundred on Sept 5, 2020 11:30:50 GMT
Typical liberal. When the narrative begins to be exposed....so does the name calling and personal attacks. The numbers are pumped, with both honest errors and dishonest errors and government manipulation.
it’s the flu! It was a manufactured bio-weapon event of immense psychological proportion. The common cold is a coronavirus and will test positive for 19. Lately we hear mostly about those testing positive with NO symptoms. The brain dead are those NOT asking questions. (And those putting masks on their babies, their toddlers, and their young children).
The future will show those who recognized the scamdemic in the past were correct in the present
|
|
|
|
Post by jamshundred on Sept 8, 2020 10:25:59 GMT
Troublemaker10 says: September 8, 2020 at 2:58 am Whoa!New article in journal published by Cambridge Univ Press says that testimony to House Oversight Committee in March 2020 mixed up case fatality rate (CFR) and infection fatality rate (IFR) for influenza, resulting in major error. (I report this w/o parsing)https://t.co/3Dpmc7kCPN pic.twitter.com/FQ8XGCRjjY— Stephen McIntyre (@climateaudit) September 7, 2020 2/ author Ronald Brown (of University of Waterloo in Ontario) said that House Committee was told that estimated mortality was 10 times higher than seasonal influenza. This was prime argument for lockdown. pic.twitter.com/gC26sqdmQi— Stephen McIntyre (@climateaudit) September 7, 2020 Continue reading: Reader App for full thread threadreaderapp.com/thread/1303024247510503424.htmlAnd, The 1% blunder: How a simple but fatal math mistake by US Covid-19 experts caused the world to panic and order lockdowns www.rt.com/op-ed/500000-covid19-math-mistake-panic/amp/?__twitter_impression=trueExcerpt: With Covid, a similar mistake happened. One type of fatality rate was substituted for another. The wrong rate was then used to predict the likely death rate. First, there’s the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR). This is the total number of people who are infected by a disease and the number of them who die….. Then there’s the Case Fatality Rate (CFR). This is the number of people suffering serious symptoms, who are probably ill enough to be in hospital. Clearly, people who are seriously ill – the “cases” – are going to have a higher mortality rate than those who are infected, >SnipSnip< Lockdown happened because we were told that Coivid could kill one percent. But Covid was never going to kill more than about 0.1 percent – max. shevee says: September 8, 2020 at 3:53 am And this is how the Stephen McIntyre thread ended–surprise! 6/ the expert who, according to Brown, made the 10x error in testimony to Congress is, by now, well known to all of us. It was, needless to say, Anthony Fauci. pic.twitter.com/xVZ8t0IQCO — Stephen McIntyre (@climateaudit) September 7, 2020 |
|
