Post by jamshundred on Apr 28, 2021 10:48:49 GMT
Stillwater
April 28, 2021 12:30 am
Host L Todd Wood interviews Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno on the results of the Antrim
“Host L Todd Wood interviews Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno on the results of the Antrim County, MI election audit he achieved through court action.”
www.bitchute.com/video/oMD8g7CXeJzm/
Excerpts to follow shortly…
Reply
Stillwater
Stillwater
April 28, 2021 1:27 am
Reply to Stillwater
Partial transcript:
3:07 – Host: So you found some really interesting things and I won’t get into it you know with the motherboards and other things… But could you just give us a 30,000 foot view of take us how you got this case into court, what the initial results were… and then I’d really to like you to go in depth as to what you reported finally about 10 days ago or something.
3:28 – Guest: We got involved in this case end of November, about November 23 we filed a lawsuit in Antrim County asking the court to allow us to conduct a forensic examination of these election voting machines, the Dominion voting machines, that sit in Antrim County.
— The judge allowed us to do that and we put a report out on December 14 and that report states that… our experts concluded that the Dominion voting system is intentionally designed to generate errors in order to influence the vote.
6:22 – And what we initially found out was that these machines generate a high number of errors. And that’s done intentionally because when you have an error in these machines… and you can select a number of interface options on the machine to generate errors.
— People don’t understand that but this is essentially a tabulator is a scanner. It scans your ballot. So you have options within the machine to loosen up or tighten up those scanning features
6:57 – Host: And the error rate you’re talking about was off the charts. I mean the legal rate is less that 1% and you were finding what?
Guest: Well we found 65% error rates. And it’s the way the machines were set up. So you can tighten up or loosen up those scanner settings
— What I meant was 65% of the votes put into the machine generated an error. And the way the system is set up those error, those ballots that generate errors are sent to adjudication.
7:38 – So as I was saying you can tighten up or loosen up these scanner settings to make the machine accept ballots that have errors and not generate an error…
— So let’s say you have your sharpie marker and you just want to write something on your ballot… You could write, “Joe Biden is not President” right across the front of your ballot.
8:11 – Well you can set the scanner to accept that. You can loosen it up that much to where it just takes anything you want it to.
— Or you could tighten it up so hard that it doesn’t accept anything… It generates errors for everything.
— Errors are important because a ballot with an error goes to adjudication.
— And an error can be a write-in candidate, an under vote, an overvote… stray marks anywhere on the ballot generate errors.
8:46 – So you can see how if there is a bad actor in some precinct, they could adjust these scanners to a way that generates a lot of errors in order to trigger adjudication.
9:00 – And these scanners have 2 output ports on them; one on the back and one underneath. And you don’t see this as a voter when you go to vote. You just think you put your ballot in and it’s counted.
— But that scanner itself will read the ballot. If it accepts it, it puts it out the back of the scanner into a bin that you don’t see but it’s underneath the scanner.
— If it creates an error it puts it into adjudication and that ballot comes out the bottom of the scanner, which again you don’t see. So you don’t even know what’s happening to your ballot when you vote.
10:39 – So that’s an important thing that we found initially. That started us moving down the road to figure out “why”. Why would you have a machine like this; Why would the state of Michigan in 2017 appropriate the money to buy these types of machines when we knew Texas at the same time rejected these machines.
— We wanted to find out more, how they actually worked and how they actually counted the vote in Antrim County.
11:22 – So we started doing more investigating, studying of these machines and this last couple weeks we put out another report in the form of a brief which provided even more detail.
— We revealed 4 pretty important things:
— We revealed an algorithm that’s at work in the state of Michigan
— We revealed that the fact that the Dominion machines… when we looked at Dominion machines & ES&S machines… In Michigan you can use Dominion machines, ES&S machines or Hart. InterCivic machines. They ultimately all trace their roots back to the same company. They essentially all run the same program. They just look different on the outside. But under the hood it’s the same machine.
12:27 – We revealed that in these machines we found either actual modems or remnants of foreign internet connections going through Taiwan or Germany cloud servers.
— So that was important because we’ve been told already that these machines are not connected to the internet.
— We revealed that in Antrim County they had purchased 17 external USB modems.
13:11 – We knew that was interesting and odd because when we went and inspected some of the machines back in November we found that the security features on these machines were ignored.
— Some of the tabulators we looked at did not have the magnetic security tape along the sides of them. Which means someone had removed the tape. If you remove the tape you can get inside the machine. If you get inside the machine you can install a modem on a motherboard.
14:03 – We also found that the locks on the external ports were missing on some of the tabulators.
14:48 – We also found out that on the actual Dominion EMS, the main machine, the Election Management System that sits in Antrim County… We found not only were all the security protocols laxing in the way they manage their system, but there’s also we found an implant program.
— This is a Microsoft Sequel management software program that is not Election Commission Certified… And this program allows a person to circumvent all security protocols and go directly to the database and edit that data on the Election Management System. Edit it before it’s sent off to the state of Michigan Secretary of State.
16:00 – This is how crazy the system… The (Dominion) manual itself tells you how to download the results off the system onto a laptop; how to upload those results into a Excel program; change them and then re-upload them back to the Election Management System.
16:45 – And the 4th thing we found was that there’s a dedicated network in the state, an intranet so to speak… where computer programs in the county may not be connected to the internet directly, but they are on a dedicated network.
— And so the County Clerks office can talk to the Sheriff’s office, they can talk to other county… the Parks Department… they can all talk together. Because the entire county is networked.
— And all you have to do if you’re a bad actor is breach that network somewhere… And if you can breach the network and you are on the internet, the the entire network’s on the internet.
18:02 – Just like the story we heard… I think it was in Georgia where they breached the network through a thermostat. So it doesn’t matter where your breach point is… Once you breach you’re in the network.
18:17 – But we found it goes beyond that. These counties talk to each other on this dedicated network. It’s not exclusive to a county but they’re also connected to each other.
18:38 – So anywhere along that network all you need is one breach, one person to get on to any point and you’re on the network for the entire state.
18:55 – Host: What’s been the response of the attorney general to your findings?
Guest: They entirely ignored it.
20:33 – They are ignoring the fact that we found an algorithm, we found a way to breach the system, we found a dedicated network, … and we found this Microsoft Sequel program on the Election Management System.
21:08 – This calls into question a lot of problems in our election system, …but it also validates so many of the affidavits that were initially signed by people, that were dismissed by liberal courts who claimed that they hadn’t seen any evidence of fraud.
21:38 – But the algorithm itself is an algorithm that was discovered by Dr. Frank, a physicist mathematician, and he was able to look at the 2020 census data and graph the 2020 census per age group. And then he was able to look at the actual number of registrations in 9 counties in the state of Michigan based on the data from the Secretary of State.. what we call in Michigan the Qualified Voter Rolls. It’s an actual data file with everyone’s registration information, addresses, what elections they voted in… in terms of who votes, who doesn’t vote and where they live.
— And again, this was a file that was downloaded November 6. So it should contain the most up-to-date data.
— So based on that we were able to graph out the actual number of registered voters per county.
— And in 9 counties we looked at, every one of them had more registered voters than eligible voters in the county.
23:18 – For instance Antrim County has 125.5% registered voters compared to eligible voters.
— That tells us the Secretary of State is not keeping her voter rolls clean.
— Then based on those 2 points… he’s able to graph out an algorithm that would be able to predict the actual ballots cast per age group in the state of Michigan.
— And then when he’s done that prediction, then overlays the actual results, the actual real number of ballots cast… He sees that there’s a correlation of .997 or .998 in certain counties.
24:49 – It’s across counties that we looked at so far. But it works in every county. The algorithms also work in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, Colorado, Texas… Not the same algorithm and that’s what’s really interesting. The algorithm doesn’t work in Ohio.
25:27 – So after 11 or 12 o’clock at night, after we are told that a machine has stopped working in various parts of the state.
— And we’re shown at the bottom, in the right-hand part of the screen that says 99% of the vote is in… But the lower left-hand part of the screen the votes are still moving.. they’re still counting… Bu t 99% stays that way for hours.
— And it’s our theory that what’s happening is the machine is still working but what it’s now doing is reviewing that Qualified Voter File. It’s determining who has voted.
— And once we know who has voted… And then the machine is able to assign voters who haven’t voted to phantom ballots. The ballots that show up with the white van in the TCF Center in Detroit at 3am.
26:33 – Now they know how far behind they are in an election, they know how many votes they need to add, how many ballots they need to put in the box… But there’s always a problem with doing that is you don’t have a voter actually attached to a ballot.
-So if there ever was an audit done you’d find that you have ballots in the machine not attached to a voter.
27:00 – Host: Where do we stand in Michigan as far as further action, further audits?
Guest: Well we’re trying to do a full audit in Antrim County now. That’s our next step. We’re trying to put pressure on the legislature to do a full audit in certain counties in the state of Michigan.
30:22 – Guest: Well you know our case still continues. We’re still going through data and trying to understand exactly what happened in that county but it seems like every day we get more information and we’re putting more information out.
— And people need to pay attention to this case because it is so important. We actually are the only case where a judge has allowed us to do discovery so that we can understand… how the machines works, what the programming looks like, and provide the actual reasonable explanation for the mistakes that occurred that are not just brushed off as a glitch or human error.
April 28, 2021 12:30 am
Host L Todd Wood interviews Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno on the results of the Antrim
“Host L Todd Wood interviews Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno on the results of the Antrim County, MI election audit he achieved through court action.”
www.bitchute.com/video/oMD8g7CXeJzm/
Excerpts to follow shortly…
Reply
Stillwater
Stillwater
April 28, 2021 1:27 am
Reply to Stillwater
Partial transcript:
3:07 – Host: So you found some really interesting things and I won’t get into it you know with the motherboards and other things… But could you just give us a 30,000 foot view of take us how you got this case into court, what the initial results were… and then I’d really to like you to go in depth as to what you reported finally about 10 days ago or something.
3:28 – Guest: We got involved in this case end of November, about November 23 we filed a lawsuit in Antrim County asking the court to allow us to conduct a forensic examination of these election voting machines, the Dominion voting machines, that sit in Antrim County.
— The judge allowed us to do that and we put a report out on December 14 and that report states that… our experts concluded that the Dominion voting system is intentionally designed to generate errors in order to influence the vote.
6:22 – And what we initially found out was that these machines generate a high number of errors. And that’s done intentionally because when you have an error in these machines… and you can select a number of interface options on the machine to generate errors.
— People don’t understand that but this is essentially a tabulator is a scanner. It scans your ballot. So you have options within the machine to loosen up or tighten up those scanning features
6:57 – Host: And the error rate you’re talking about was off the charts. I mean the legal rate is less that 1% and you were finding what?
Guest: Well we found 65% error rates. And it’s the way the machines were set up. So you can tighten up or loosen up those scanner settings
— What I meant was 65% of the votes put into the machine generated an error. And the way the system is set up those error, those ballots that generate errors are sent to adjudication.
7:38 – So as I was saying you can tighten up or loosen up these scanner settings to make the machine accept ballots that have errors and not generate an error…
— So let’s say you have your sharpie marker and you just want to write something on your ballot… You could write, “Joe Biden is not President” right across the front of your ballot.
8:11 – Well you can set the scanner to accept that. You can loosen it up that much to where it just takes anything you want it to.
— Or you could tighten it up so hard that it doesn’t accept anything… It generates errors for everything.
— Errors are important because a ballot with an error goes to adjudication.
— And an error can be a write-in candidate, an under vote, an overvote… stray marks anywhere on the ballot generate errors.
8:46 – So you can see how if there is a bad actor in some precinct, they could adjust these scanners to a way that generates a lot of errors in order to trigger adjudication.
9:00 – And these scanners have 2 output ports on them; one on the back and one underneath. And you don’t see this as a voter when you go to vote. You just think you put your ballot in and it’s counted.
— But that scanner itself will read the ballot. If it accepts it, it puts it out the back of the scanner into a bin that you don’t see but it’s underneath the scanner.
— If it creates an error it puts it into adjudication and that ballot comes out the bottom of the scanner, which again you don’t see. So you don’t even know what’s happening to your ballot when you vote.
10:39 – So that’s an important thing that we found initially. That started us moving down the road to figure out “why”. Why would you have a machine like this; Why would the state of Michigan in 2017 appropriate the money to buy these types of machines when we knew Texas at the same time rejected these machines.
— We wanted to find out more, how they actually worked and how they actually counted the vote in Antrim County.
11:22 – So we started doing more investigating, studying of these machines and this last couple weeks we put out another report in the form of a brief which provided even more detail.
— We revealed 4 pretty important things:
— We revealed an algorithm that’s at work in the state of Michigan
— We revealed that the fact that the Dominion machines… when we looked at Dominion machines & ES&S machines… In Michigan you can use Dominion machines, ES&S machines or Hart. InterCivic machines. They ultimately all trace their roots back to the same company. They essentially all run the same program. They just look different on the outside. But under the hood it’s the same machine.
12:27 – We revealed that in these machines we found either actual modems or remnants of foreign internet connections going through Taiwan or Germany cloud servers.
— So that was important because we’ve been told already that these machines are not connected to the internet.
— We revealed that in Antrim County they had purchased 17 external USB modems.
13:11 – We knew that was interesting and odd because when we went and inspected some of the machines back in November we found that the security features on these machines were ignored.
— Some of the tabulators we looked at did not have the magnetic security tape along the sides of them. Which means someone had removed the tape. If you remove the tape you can get inside the machine. If you get inside the machine you can install a modem on a motherboard.
14:03 – We also found that the locks on the external ports were missing on some of the tabulators.
14:48 – We also found out that on the actual Dominion EMS, the main machine, the Election Management System that sits in Antrim County… We found not only were all the security protocols laxing in the way they manage their system, but there’s also we found an implant program.
— This is a Microsoft Sequel management software program that is not Election Commission Certified… And this program allows a person to circumvent all security protocols and go directly to the database and edit that data on the Election Management System. Edit it before it’s sent off to the state of Michigan Secretary of State.
16:00 – This is how crazy the system… The (Dominion) manual itself tells you how to download the results off the system onto a laptop; how to upload those results into a Excel program; change them and then re-upload them back to the Election Management System.
16:45 – And the 4th thing we found was that there’s a dedicated network in the state, an intranet so to speak… where computer programs in the county may not be connected to the internet directly, but they are on a dedicated network.
— And so the County Clerks office can talk to the Sheriff’s office, they can talk to other county… the Parks Department… they can all talk together. Because the entire county is networked.
— And all you have to do if you’re a bad actor is breach that network somewhere… And if you can breach the network and you are on the internet, the the entire network’s on the internet.
18:02 – Just like the story we heard… I think it was in Georgia where they breached the network through a thermostat. So it doesn’t matter where your breach point is… Once you breach you’re in the network.
18:17 – But we found it goes beyond that. These counties talk to each other on this dedicated network. It’s not exclusive to a county but they’re also connected to each other.
18:38 – So anywhere along that network all you need is one breach, one person to get on to any point and you’re on the network for the entire state.
18:55 – Host: What’s been the response of the attorney general to your findings?
Guest: They entirely ignored it.
20:33 – They are ignoring the fact that we found an algorithm, we found a way to breach the system, we found a dedicated network, … and we found this Microsoft Sequel program on the Election Management System.
21:08 – This calls into question a lot of problems in our election system, …but it also validates so many of the affidavits that were initially signed by people, that were dismissed by liberal courts who claimed that they hadn’t seen any evidence of fraud.
21:38 – But the algorithm itself is an algorithm that was discovered by Dr. Frank, a physicist mathematician, and he was able to look at the 2020 census data and graph the 2020 census per age group. And then he was able to look at the actual number of registrations in 9 counties in the state of Michigan based on the data from the Secretary of State.. what we call in Michigan the Qualified Voter Rolls. It’s an actual data file with everyone’s registration information, addresses, what elections they voted in… in terms of who votes, who doesn’t vote and where they live.
— And again, this was a file that was downloaded November 6. So it should contain the most up-to-date data.
— So based on that we were able to graph out the actual number of registered voters per county.
— And in 9 counties we looked at, every one of them had more registered voters than eligible voters in the county.
23:18 – For instance Antrim County has 125.5% registered voters compared to eligible voters.
— That tells us the Secretary of State is not keeping her voter rolls clean.
— Then based on those 2 points… he’s able to graph out an algorithm that would be able to predict the actual ballots cast per age group in the state of Michigan.
— And then when he’s done that prediction, then overlays the actual results, the actual real number of ballots cast… He sees that there’s a correlation of .997 or .998 in certain counties.
24:49 – It’s across counties that we looked at so far. But it works in every county. The algorithms also work in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, Colorado, Texas… Not the same algorithm and that’s what’s really interesting. The algorithm doesn’t work in Ohio.
25:27 – So after 11 or 12 o’clock at night, after we are told that a machine has stopped working in various parts of the state.
— And we’re shown at the bottom, in the right-hand part of the screen that says 99% of the vote is in… But the lower left-hand part of the screen the votes are still moving.. they’re still counting… Bu t 99% stays that way for hours.
— And it’s our theory that what’s happening is the machine is still working but what it’s now doing is reviewing that Qualified Voter File. It’s determining who has voted.
— And once we know who has voted… And then the machine is able to assign voters who haven’t voted to phantom ballots. The ballots that show up with the white van in the TCF Center in Detroit at 3am.
26:33 – Now they know how far behind they are in an election, they know how many votes they need to add, how many ballots they need to put in the box… But there’s always a problem with doing that is you don’t have a voter actually attached to a ballot.
-So if there ever was an audit done you’d find that you have ballots in the machine not attached to a voter.
27:00 – Host: Where do we stand in Michigan as far as further action, further audits?
Guest: Well we’re trying to do a full audit in Antrim County now. That’s our next step. We’re trying to put pressure on the legislature to do a full audit in certain counties in the state of Michigan.
30:22 – Guest: Well you know our case still continues. We’re still going through data and trying to understand exactly what happened in that county but it seems like every day we get more information and we’re putting more information out.
— And people need to pay attention to this case because it is so important. We actually are the only case where a judge has allowed us to do discovery so that we can understand… how the machines works, what the programming looks like, and provide the actual reasonable explanation for the mistakes that occurred that are not just brushed off as a glitch or human error.